THE THINKING TRAJECTORY PROFILE OF STUDENTS TO PROVE THEOREM IN REAL ANALYSIS SUBJECT
Abstract
This study is a descriptive study aimed to describe students’ thinking trajectory inNproving theorem within real analysis I course. The subjects of this study are two students, man and woman who both have high academic ability based on GPA for courses in mathematics. The research instrument consists of researcher, interview sheet, interview guides and student worksheet that contains proving theorem. In this research the data analysis technique are data pruning, data presenting and conclusing. From the data analysis, it is obtained that the there is different thinking trajectory from the male and
female subjects. The male student’s thinking trajectory: 1) At the information input stage, the subject understands well what is known and what will be proved, 2) at the information
processing stage, the subject is able to construct the proving steps correctly, the subject uses the definition available before, 3) within the information output step, the subject does not recheck the steps that he has written down, the subject gives answer illustration through pictures but he faces difficulty in explaining the picture. Female subject’s thinking trajectory : 1) at the information input stage, the subject understands well and she is able to write what is known and what is will be proved correctly, 2) at the stage of information processing, the subjects writes long and coherent steps , but there is a concept that has not been understood well , in constructing the proof, she does not use the existing definition, 3) at the information output stage, the subject re-checks the evidentiary steps which she writes previously, subject give answers with pictures and illustrations which she can explain well.
Downloads
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with DIDAKTIKA: Jurnal Pemikiran Pendidikan agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived inappropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.