Desain Didaktis untuk Memfasilitasi Kemampuan Berpikir Aljabar Perkalian dan Pembagian di Kelas V Sekolah Dasar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30587/didaktika.v31i2.9698Keywords:
Desain Didaktis, Aljabar, Perkalian, PembagianAbstract
Algebra learning in elementary school has a crucial role as a foundation for students in understanding algebra at a higher level. But in reality, many learning obstacles arise in learning algebra, especially in multiplication and division materials. Therefore, to overcome the learning obstacles faced, the researcher aims to create meaningful learning for students through the development of didactic designs that can facilitate algebraic thinking skills, especially in multiplication and division materials in grade V of elementary school. The research method used in this study is Didactical Design Research (DDR) which consists of prospective analysis, metapedadidactic analysis, and retrospective analysis. The learning obstacles found are related to the difficulty of students in understanding the same concept as (=), identifying the relationship of multiplication and division, determining the final result of a problem, translating the story problem into a mathematical sentence. The learning design developed applies the Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach where the learning design contains four learning components, namely contextual problem, experience based activity, bridge activity, and formal activity. The didactic design was implemented in two cycles and it is known that the didactic design can minimize the difficulties experienced by students, as evidenced by the increase in the percentage of student response questionnaires from 90% in the initial didactic design to 92% in the implementation of the revised didactic design.
References
Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13–20.
Drijvers, P., Goddijn, A., & Kindt, M. (2011). Algebra education: Exploring topics and themes. In Secondary algebra education (pp. 5–26). Brill.
Dwirahayu, G., Halpiani, M., & Kustiawati, D. (2019). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Aljabar Melalui Pembelajaran Schema-Based Instructiondengan Strategi Fops. FIBONACCI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 5(2), 105–116.
Fauziah, E., Lidinillah, D. A. M., & Apriani, I. F. (2023). Obstacle to Learning Algebra in Elementary Schools. AlphaMath: Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(2), 161–168.
Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education.
Lidinillah, D. A. M. (2012). Educational design research: a theoretical framework for action. Tasikmalaya: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Kampus Tasikmalaya.
Moru, E. K. (2007). Talking with the literature on epistemological obstacles. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(3), 34–37.
Mulyana, E., Turmudi, T., & Juandi, D. (2014). Model pengembangan desain didaktis subject specific pedagogy bidang matematika melalui program pendidikan profesi guru. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 19(2), 141–149.
Nisa, V. K., Lidinillah, D. A. M., & Apriani, I. F. (2023). Desain Didaktis Bahan Ajar Aljabar untuk Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar Berdasarkan Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 2804–2817.
Polman, J., Hornstra, L., & Volman, M. (2021). The meaning of meaningful learning in mathematics in upper-primary education. Learning Environments Research, 24(3), 469–486.
Putra, R. W. Y., & Setiawati, N. (2018). Pengembangan Desain Didaktis Bahan Ajar Persamaan Garis Lurus. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 11(1).
Ruthven, K., Laborde, C., Leach, J., & Tiberghien, A. (2009). Design tools in didactical research: Instrumenting the epistemological and cognitive aspects of the design of teaching sequences. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 329–342.
Saragih, M. J. (2018). Kesulitan Belajar Matematika Berkaitan dengan Konsep pada Topik Aljabar: Studi Kasus pada Siswa Kelas VII Sekolah ABC Lampung.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. CV. Alfabeta, Bandung, 25.
Suryadi, D. (2019). Landasan filosofis penelitian desain didaktis (DDR). Pusat Pengembangan DDR Indonesia.
Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2014). Elementary and middle school mathematics. Pearson.
Windsor, W. (2010). Algebraic Thinking: A Problem Solving Approach. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
Yunarti, T. (2014). Desain didaktis teori peluang SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Universitas Lampung, 15(1), 121658.
Yustiana, S., & Kusumadewi, R. F. (2020). Pengembangan bahan ajar modul berbasis ctl sebagai bagian dari pengembangan ssp. Jurnal Ilmiah KONTEKSTUAL, 1(02), 1–6.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Publisher Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with DIDAKTIKA: Jurnal Pemikiran Pendidikan agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived inappropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.
