Analisis Perkembangan Keterampilan Metakognitif Peserta Didik Kelas V SD dalam Pembelajaran IPA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30587/didaktika.v31i2.9848Keywords:
Metacognitive skills, Learning planning, Learning monitoring, Learning evaluationAbstract
Metacognitive skills refer to an individual's ability to think about their thinking process, including planning, monitoring, and evaluating how they learn. This study aims to identify the extent of metacognitive skills possessed by students from three different schools. The type of research used is descriptive qualitative, which was conducted in April 2025 involving 67 students from three different schools as samples, including SDN Lidah Kulon 4 with 18 students, SDN Karah 3 with 26 students, and SDI Darul Arqom with 23 students. Data collection techniques were carried out by distributing questionnaires to students and interviews with homeroom teachers. The results of the analysis showed that there were three main indicators of metacognitive skills, namely planning, monitoring, and evaluation. At the planning stage, students plan what to learn, how to learn it, and the goals they want to achieve, such as "Getting an explanation before reading the text." At the monitoring stage, students evaluate how they understand the material and the effectiveness of the strategies used, for example "I read straight away without thinking first." At the evaluation stage, students reflect on whether the learning that has been done is good, what strategies are effective, and what aspects need to be improved, for example "Comparing with other lessons or books." It is recommended that students be more active in planning, monitoring, and reflecting on their learning process to increase effectiveness and achieve more optimal learning goals.
References
Anderson, L. W. (2001). Educational objectives: The cognitive domain. The D.C. Heath and Company.
Ansori, Y. Z., Puspitasari, W. D., & Ratnawati, E. (2021). Pengaruh model pembelajaran meaningful instructional design terhadap kemampuan metakognitif peserta didik di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Elementaria Edukasia, 4(2), 292-301.
Bagiada, M., & Jayanta, I. N. L. (2022). Aktivitas Pembelajaran Berbantuan Media Levidio Presentation Meningkatkan Literasi Sains dan Kemampuan Metakognitif Peserta didik Kelas V SD. Jurnal Edutech Undiksha, 10(1), 61-68.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Corebima, A. D., & Idrus, H. (2006). Strategi metakognitif dalam pembelajaran. Kompas.
Effendi, A. (2016). Implementasi Model Creative Problem Solving Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Metakognitif Berdasarkan Kemampuan Awal Matematis Peserta didik. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 9(2).
Efklides, A. (2009). Metacognition: Defining the construct and its relation to self-regulation. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 10-17.
Fatmawati, A., & Karmana, I. W. (2023). Profil Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Mahapeserta didik pada Materi Fisiologi Tumbuhan. Bioscientist: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 11(1), 800-810.
Fisher, R. (2005). Teaching children to think (2nd ed.).
Nelson Thornes.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-236). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Galyam, A., & Le Grange, L. (2005). Learning theory and teaching practice: A case study of a research-based school. South African Journal of Education, 25(4), 190–196.
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
Hofer, M., & Grandgenett, N. (2012). TPACK development in teacher education: A longitudinal study of preservice teachers in a technology integration course. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(1), 83–106.
Hutauruk, S. (2017). Metakognitif dalam proses belajar mengajar. Jurnal Pendidikan.
Indriani, S. (2015). Pengembangan keterampilan berpikir dan proses kognitif peserta didik melalui pendekatan pembelajaran berbasis masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 4(2), 108–115.
Iskandar, S. M. (2016). Pendekatan keterampilan metakognitif dalam pembelajaran sains di kelas. Erudio Journal of Educational Innovation, 2(2), 13- 20.
Lailiyah, P., Zuhri, M. S., & Endahwuri, D. (2023). Profil Kemampuan Metakognisi Peserta didik dalam Memecahkan Masalah Kontekstual Matematika Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar. Jurnal Kualita Pendidikan, 4(1), 82-88.
Larasati, R. M., Nugroho, A., & Harmianto, S. (2020). Keterampilan metakognitif peserta didik kelas V dalam pembelajaran jarak jauh di SD Negeri 02 Badak. Jurnal Papeda: Jurnal Publikasi Pendidikan Dasar, 2(2), 129-138.
Malahayati, E. N., Corebima, A. D., & Zubaidah, S. (2015). Hubungan keterampilan metakognitif dan kemampuan berpikir kritis dengan hasil belajar biologi peserta didik sma dalam pembelajaran problem based learning (PBL). Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Universitas Negeri Malang, 3(4), 178-185.
Manisa, T., Tarjuman, A., Syalom, A., & Tomi, T. (2025). Studi Deskriptif: Kemampuan Metakognitif Peserta didik SMP pada Mata Pelajaran IPA. Bioed: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 13(1), 58-63.
Novita, D., Purwanto, H., & Setiawan, B. (2018). Peran metakognitif dalam pembelajaran aktif di sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 12(3), 45-52.
Roebers, C. M., Krebs, S. S., & Roderer, T. (2019). Metacognitive monitoring and control processes involved in primary school children's test performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1371. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01371
Sanjaya, W. (2006). Strategi pembelajaran: Berorientasi standar proses pendidikan. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Saputra, N. N., & Andriyani, R. (2018). Pentingnya berpikir metakognitif untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah peserta didik. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Dasar, 5(2), 112–119.
Sastrawati, E., dkk. (2011). Problem Based Learning, Strategi Metakognisi, dan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Peserta didik. Jurnal Tekno-Pedagogi Vol. 1 No. 2 September 2011 : 1-14.
Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1–2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003044231033
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
Schunk, D.H. and Zimmerman, B.J. (2012). Self- Regulation and Learning. In Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition (eds I. Weiner, W.M. Reynolds and G.E. Miller). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop 207003
Setiawan, A. (2016). Penerapan keterampilan metakognitif dalam pembelajaran di sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 8(2), 150-160.
Setiawan, A., & Susilo, S. (2015). Pengaruh refleksi diri terhadap keterampilan metakognitif dalam pembelajaran. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan, 20(1), 85-92.
Siregar, D. (2019). Peran metakognisi dalam meningkatkan kemandirian belajar peserta didik. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan dan Konseling, 5(1), 56–65.
Siregar, S. (2019). Analisis keterampilan metakognitif dan sikap ilmiah peserta didik melalui metode pembelajaran inkuiri. Biotik: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi Teknologi Dan Kependidikan, 7(2), 141-145.
Sutami, N. K. A. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Hasil Belajar Ipa Dan Kemampuan Metakognitif Peserta didik Kelas V Sd (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha).
Syahbana, M. (2013). Pengembangan keterampilan metakognitif untuk pemecahan masalah dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 18(1), 28-40.
Van Loon, M., & Roebers, C. M. (2024). Development of metacognitive monitoring and control skills in elementary school: a latent profile approach. Metacognition and Learning, 19(3), 1065-1089.
Widiana, W. (2022). Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Metakognitif di Sekolah Dasar Kajian Berpikir tentang Berpikir. J. Ilm. Sekol. Dasar, 8, 1- 68.
Widiana, I. W. (2023). Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Metakognitif di Sekolah Dasar. Orasi Ilmiah, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Publisher Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with DIDAKTIKA: Jurnal Pemikiran Pendidikan agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived inappropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.
