Penerapan Model Pembelajaran POE (Predict-Observe-Explain) Terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Sekolah Dasar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30587/didaktika.v30i2.7658Keywords:
Model Pembelajaran, Predict-Observe-Explain, Penalaran MatematisAbstract
This research was conducted at SD Muhammadiyah Gresik, Grade V, Academic Year 2023/2024. The purpose of this research is to determine the implementation of the POE (Predict-Observe-Explain) learning model's influence on the mathematical reasoning abilities of fifth-grade students in mathematics, specifically in comparing the characteristics of flat shapes in logical reasoning. This research is a quantitative study using the experimental method. The data collection techniques used are observation and questionnaires. The results of the hypothesis test calculation using the independent sample t-test obtained a significance value of 0.000 < 0.05, so H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted. Additionally, according to the hypothesis testing rule thitung ≥ ttabel, the result of 2.25 ≥ 1.99 indicates that H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted. Based on the results of the hypothesis test, it shows that the adaptive mathematical reasoning ability with the Predict Observe Explain learning model is higher compared to the adaptive mathematical reasoning ability of students taught with the conventional learning model. The results of the calculations can be concluded that there is a significant influence of the application of the POE (Predict-Observe-Explain) learning model on students' mathematical reasoning abilities.
References
Arifudin, Muhamad. (2016). Pengaruh Metode Discovery Learning Pada Materi Trigonometri Terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Adaptif Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 1(2), 129-140.
Banawi, Anasufi. (2019). Prospective Primary School Teachers’ Conception Change on States of Matter and Their Changes through Predict-Observe-Explain Strategy. International Journal of Instruction. 12(3), 360-374.
Desriyanti, Y. (2014). Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving (TAPPS) Terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Adaptif Matematis Siswa. Skripsi. Universitas Islam Negeri Jakarta.
Hilario, Jose S. (2015).The Use of Predict-Observe-Explain-Explore (POEE) as a New Teaching Strategy in General Chemistry-Laboratory. International Journal of Education and Research. 3(2), 37-48.
Hong, Jon-Chao, dkk. (2021) Critical attitude and ability associated with students’ self-confidence and attitude toward “predict-observe-explain” online science inquiry learning. Computers & Education 166, 1-14.
Kurniawati, L. (2006). Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Pemecahan Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman dan Penalaran Matematik Siswa SMP. Jurnal ALGORITMA, 1(1), 77.
Marasabessy, Rosida. (2021). Study of Mathematical Reasoning Ability for Mathematics Learning in Schools: A Literature Review. Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science, 1(2), 79-90.
Muhibbudin, dkk. (2019). Improving Critical Thinking Skill and Scientific Behavior through the Implementation of Predict Observe Explain Learning Model. IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education, 5(15), 337-342.
Nugroho, A. S., Suryanti, S., & Wiryanto, W. (2022). Peningkatan Kualitas Guru, Sebanding dengan Peningkatan Pendidikan? Jurnal Basicedu, 6(5), 7758–7767. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i5.3354
Nopitasari, Dian. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving (CPS) Terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Adaptif Matematis Siswa. Mathline Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 103-112.
Nuraeni, Nina, dkk. (2019). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) dalam meningkatkan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa. Jurnal Education FKIP UNMA, 5(1), 1-11.
Ruslan, A.S. & Santoso, B. (2013). Pengaruh Pemberian Soal Open-Ended Terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa. Jurnal Kreano, 4(2), Desember. Semarang: UNSRI.
S Sreerekha, dkk. (2016). Effect of Predict-Observe-Explain Strategy on Achievement In Chemistry of Secondary School Students. International Journal of Education & Teaching Analytics, 1(1), 1-5.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Wahyuni, S.E., Sudarisman, S., Karyanto, P. (2013). Pembelajaran biologi model poe (prediction, observation, explanation) melalui laboratorium riil dan laboratorium virtuil ditinjau dari aktivitas belajar dan kemampuan berpikir abstrak. Bioedukasi, 6(1), 63-778.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with DIDAKTIKA: Jurnal Pemikiran Pendidikan agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived inappropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.
