Integrasi Keterampilan Proses Sains dalam Pembelajaran Melalui Model Pembelajaran Inquiry untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik SDN Magersari 2 Sidoarjo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30587/didaktika.v31i1.9552Keywords:
Inquiry Terbimbing, Keterampilan Proses Sains, Literasi Sains, Pembelajaran IPAS, Sekolah DasarAbstract
Science literacy is one of the essential competencies that students must have in facing the challenges of the 21st century. However, the results of international assessments show that the science literacy of students in Indonesia is still low. One of the factors contributing to the low science literacy is the lack of integration of science process skills in learning. This study aims to integrate science process skills in science learning through a guided inquiry learning model to improve students' science literacy. The research method used was an experiment with a one group pretest-posttest design. The subjects of the study were fifth grade students of Magersari 2 Elementary School, Sidoarjo. Data were collected through observation, science literacy tests, and interviews with teachers and students. The results showed that the application of the guided inquiry learning model significantly improved students' science process skills and science literacy. Students became more active in making observations, asking questions, interpreting data, and drawing conclusions based on the results of the investigation. Thus, the integration of science process skills in the guided inquiry learning model can be an alternative effective learning strategy to improve elementary school students' science literacy.
References
Ambarsari, W. (2012). Penerapan pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing terhadap keterampilan proses sains dasar pada pelajaran biologi siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 7 Surakarta.
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. National Science Teachers Association.
Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. R. (2010). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools: Developing fundamental knowledge and skills. Pearson.
Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300-329.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Hardiyanti, P. (2020). Analisis keterampilan proses sains melalui pembelajaran berbasis praktikum mata pelajaran IPA pada peserta didik kelas VIII di MTS Negeri 1 Bandar Lampung(Doctoral dissertation, UIN Raden Intan Lampung).
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
Kemendikbud. (2021). Hasil PISA 2018: Refleksi dan Rekomendasi Kebijakan Pendidikan Indonesia. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.
Kim, M., Hannafin, M. J., & Bryan, L. A. (2018). Technology-enhanced inquiry tools in science education: Analyzing cognitive and pedagogical influences. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(2), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9713-6
Llewellyn, D. (2013). Inquire within: Implementing inquiry-based science standards in grades 3-8. Corwin Press.
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction—What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474-496.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., ... & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
Rosa, F. O. (2015). Pengembangan modul pembelajaran IPA SMP pada materi tekanan berbasis keterampilan proses sains. JPF (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika) FKIP UM Metro, 3(1).
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
Zacharia, Z. C., Olympiou, G., & Papaevripidou, M. (2015). Effects of virtual versus physical laboratories on students’ conceptual understanding, inquiry skills, and motivation in science education. Computers & Education, 85, 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.008
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with DIDAKTIKA: Jurnal Pemikiran Pendidikan agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived inappropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.
