The Effect Using Local Jokes Strategies To Improve Students’s Speaking Ability In Secondary Level

Authors

  • Sherlya Maftukha Unniversitras Muhammadiyah Gresik
  • Ulfatul Ma'rifah Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30587/didaktika.v29i1.5244

Keywords:

Local joke; Pun; Speaking ability

Abstract

This paper aims to examine and compare the effects of word-play-based local humor strategies. In learning the speaking skills of EFL students at SMP Muhammadiyah 4 Gresik at the secondary level, in this study, 26 EFL students in classes VII A and VII B at an institution in the city of Gresik, East Java, were asked to become a research group, and they were divided randomly into two groups, namely the group experiments using pun-based local jokes and the control group using cooperative learning strategies based on TGT (Team Games Tournament). Each group contains 13 students. Prior to treatment, all participants took a pre-test, which aimed to ensure the homogeneity of these participants. The treatment for experimental participants, namely local jokes, was then started and continued with post-test speaking with material according to the syllabus. Data were then collected and analyzed through the paired samples T-test and independent samples T-test by comparing the results of the study groups before and after being given treatment and comparing the learning outcomes after being given treatment between groups, and the results then revealed that for students who were given more effective treatment, their scores were significantly higher than those of those who did not use conventional methods. The results of the control class students, who were not given any influence, were then lower than those of the experimental group. Thus, it can be concluded that there are significant differences between the experimental group and the control group in terms of how they are affected by the treatment.

References

Ahmad, N. A., Mohamed, S., Hasnan, K. A., Ali, N., & Ahmad Puad, F. N. (2018). The use of teacher's joke increases students’ involvement inside classroom. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 5(10), 5039–5046. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsshi/v5i10.06
Arian, T., & Mamaghani, H. J. (2019). Semi-online Planning: the Route to Fluency, Complexity, and Accuracy of EFL Learners’ Oral Production. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 53.
Attardo, S. (2008). Semantics and pragmatics of humor. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(6), 1203–1215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2008.00107.x
Bryant, J., Comisky, P., & Zillman, D. (1979). Teachers’ humor in the college classroom.
Communication Education, 28, 110-118.
Davies, C. E. (2015). Humor in intercultural interaction as both content and process in the classroom. HUMOR, 28(3). https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2015-0065
Didiek Rahmanadjie, Sejarah, Teori, Jenis dan Fungsi Humor. Seni dan Desain Fakultas Sastra Universitas Negeri Malang. Dalam http://sastra.um.ac.id
Dynel, Marta. 2009. Humorous garden-paths: a pragmatic-cognitive study. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing
Garner, R. (2005). Humor, analogy, and metaphor: H.A.M. it up in teaching.
Retrieved July 17, 2010, from http://radicalpedagogy.icaap.org/content/issue6_2/garner.html
Gönülal, T . (2018). Laughing Matters: ELLs’ Comprehension and Perceptions of Humor. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 7 (4), 453-468. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30703/cije.455199
Heidari-Shahreza, M. A. (2018). A cross-sectional analysis of teacher-initiated verbal humor and Ludic language play in an English as a foreign language (EFL) context. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1430474. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2018.1430474
Kruger, A. (1996). The nature of humor in human nature: Cross-cultural commonalities.
Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 9, 235-241
Larkin-Galiñanes, C. (2017). An overview of humor theory. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor, 4–16. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162-2
Lefcourt, H. M. & Martin, R. A. (1986). Humor and Life Stress: Antidote to Adversity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Matsumoto, Y. (2014). Collaborative co-construction of humorous interaction among ELF speakers. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 3(1), 81-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2014-0004
Matsumoto, Y. (2014). Collaborative co-construction of humorous interaction among Elf speakers. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 3(1), 81–107. https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2014-0004
McGhee, P. E. (1983a). The role of arousal and hemispheric lateralization in humor. In P.E.
McGhee & J.H. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of humor research (Vol. I, pp. 109-134) New York: Springer-Verlag
Muñoz-Basols, J. (2005). Learning through Humor: Using humorous resources in the teaching of foreign Languages. The A.T.I.S. Bulletin, 42-46.
Najafi, M., Shahrokhi, M., Shojaee, M., & Atharizadeh, M. (2021). A comparative study of the effect of humor strategies on Iranian efl learners’ vocabulary learning. International Journal of Language Education, 5(4), 382. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i4.15138
Paribakht, T.S., & Wesche, M. (1999). Reading and ‘Incidental’ L2 Vocabulary Acquisition.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 195-229.
Petraki, E., & Pham Nguyen, H. H. (2016). Do Asian EFL teachers use humor in the classroom? A case study of Vietnamese EFL University Teachers. System, 61, 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.08.002
POMERANTZ, A. N. N. E., & BELL, N. A. N. C. Y. D. (2011). Humor as safe house in the Foreign Language Classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01274.x
Raskin V. (1985). Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. (pp. 113-114) Dordrecht-Boston-Lancaster: D. Reidel. In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theories_of_humor#cite_ref-31
Raskin, V. (2017). Script-based semantic and ontological semantic theories of humor. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor, 109–125. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162-9
Reddington, E., & Waring, H. Z. (2015). Understanding the sequential resources for doing humor in the language classroom. HUMOR, 28(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2014-0144
Stuart, W. D., and Rosenfeld, L. B.1994. Student perceptions of teacher humor
and classroom climate. Communication Research Reports. 11. 87-97.
Syafiq, A. N., & Saleh, M. (2012). Humor English teaching material for improving students’
speaking skill with high and low learning motivation. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 7(1).
Wagner, M., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (2011). The use of humor in the Foreign Language Classroom: Funny and effective? Humor - International Journal of Humor Research, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2011.024
Wanzer, M. B., Frymier, A. B., & Irwin, J. (2010). An explanation of the relationship between instructor humor and student learning: Instructional humor processing theory. Communication Education, 59(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903367238
Wulf, D. (2010). A humor competence curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 44(1), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.215250
Wutun, A. A., Kesuma Wijaya, I., & Dahlan Bahang, M. (2021). The Power of Local Language Terms in Creating Humor in English Language Teaching. Eralingua: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Asing Dan Sastra, 5(2), 483–491. https://ojs.unm.ac.id/eralingua
Zillman, D., & Bryant, J. (1983). Uses and effects of humor in educational ventures. In P. E.
McGhee & J. H. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of Humor Research, Volume 2: Applied
Studies, 173-194. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Ziv, A. (1988). Teaching and learning with humor: Experiment and replication. Journal of
Experimental Education, 57 (1), 5-15.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-16

How to Cite

Maftukha, S., & Ma’rifah, U. (2023). The Effect Using Local Jokes Strategies To Improve Students’s Speaking Ability In Secondary Level. DIDAKTIKA : Jurnal Pemikiran Pendidikan, 29(1), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.30587/didaktika.v29i1.5244

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.