Describing Student Activeness Using Transcript Based Lesson Analysis In Lesson Study Material Hydrostatic Pressure And Pascal's Law
Abstract
This research was conducted to describe the activities of students using Transcript Based Lesson Analysis in Lesson Study on hydrostatic pressure and Pascal's Law class XI at SMAN 11 Muaro Jambi. This type of research was obtained from the results of learning video recordings, observer field notes and documentation. This research was carried out in collaboration with the observer team in each cycle through 3 lesson study stages, namely plan, do, and see. The analysis in this study cannot be carried out directly during learning but through the results of recording all teacher and student activities as well as observations made by the observer. Through this analysis one can see how the application of lesson study based on TCL or SCL in the learning process is TCL or SCL in nature from the many dialogues that arise between the teacher and students, this dialogue in the implementation of cycles I and II is shown in the number of words graph. Based on the results of this study, in cycle I it was seen that the teacher still dominated learning, not many students responded and answered questions given by the teacher. Cycle II in this study learning took place in group discussions where teacher dominance was still visible but better than cycle I because more student responses appeared and some students were active in discussing problem solving. Overall learning in class XI MIPA 2 SMAN 11 Muaro Jambi is categorized as TCL so that the suggestions contained in this study are for teachers to be able to study and design better learning so that they can realize learning that is student centered learning and apply learning with lesson study based on Transcript Based Lesson Analysis
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with DIDAKTIKA: Jurnal Pemikiran Pendidikan agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived inappropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.
