The Effectiveness of Coastal Environments Learning Media to Increase Elementary School Students' Cognitive Responses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30587/didaktika.v31i1.9438Keywords:
Learning Media; Coastal environment; Cognitive responsesAbstract
Coastal environments have in recent years become the focus of government development with the hope of becoming a center for ecological protection and an educational tourism destination due to the large number of mangrove plant species and migratory bird species that stop by from various parts of the world. A high level of environmental awareness and good English language skills are very urgent to support the sustainability and benefits of this ecosystem and to expose it internationally. However, the majority of English language learning in schools focuses more on general knowledge without any specifications and differentiation tailored to the environment around students. Therefore, this research aims to determine the level of effectiveness of digital-based English learning media and the coastal environment with the hope of increasing elementary school students' cognitive response to the sustainability and optimization of coastal sustainability, which is located on the north coast of East Java. The research method used is mixed-method with explanatory sequential strategy conducted in three elementary schools located around the coastal area. Then the data obtained will be processed using nested ANOVA. The results of this research are crucial stages needed to create an effective integration model for English language learning and the environment that meets regional needs to accommodate the forthcoming policy from the ministry of education that will make English as one of the integral subjects in elementary school.
References
2. Saiful JA. Eco-ELT for environmental research and praxis in ELT. J English as a Foreign Lang. 2023;13(2):373–98.
3. Asmara CH, Anwar K, Muhammad RN. EFL Learners’ Perception toward an Outdoor Learning Program. Int J Educ Lit Stud. 2016;4(2):74–81.
4. Steffensen SV, Fill A. Ecolinguistics: The state of the art and future horizons. Lang Sci [Internet]. 2014;41:6–25. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.003
5. Yagcioglu O. The Positive Effects Of Cognitive Learaning Styles In Elt Classes. Eur J English Lang Teach [Internet]. 2016;1(2):78–91. Available from: www.oapub.org/edu
6. Bane G, Kitila T. Cognitive and Affective Responses of L1 (Afan Oromo) in the Efl Classroom. Lang Lit J Linguist Lit Lang Teach. 2023;7(1):1–14.
7. Jacobs GM, Lie A, Amy S. An Indonesian Example of Teaching English via Environmental Education. Ecodidactic Perspect English Lang Lit Cult. 2006;45–62.
8. Ambe BA, Agbor CE, Amalu MN, Ngban AN, Bekomson AN, Etan MO, et al. Electronic media learning technologies and environmental education pedagogy in tertiary institutions in Nigeria. Soc Sci Humanit Open [Internet]. 2024;9(October 2023):100760. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100760
9. Britiviliani N, Rahmawati E. Use of Picture Books to Expose Young Learners Writing Activities. loquen English Stud J. 2018;11(2):60.
10. Muhammad RN, Rahim AR, Sukaris S, Fauziyah N. Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Bahasa Inggris Melalui “English Course” Dengan Media Aplikasi “Our World 1.0” Pada Peserta Didik Kelas 4 Sekolah Dasar Negeri Indro. DedikasiMU(Journal Community Serv. 2021;3(1):733.
11. Arifani Y, Mindari R, Hidayat N, Wicaksono AS. Basic psychological needs of in-service EFL teachers in blended professional training: voices of teachers and learners. Interact Learn Environ [Internet]. 2023 Aug 18;31(6):3868–81. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1943691
12. Wei R. The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics. South African Linguist Appl Lang Stud [Internet]. 2020 Oct 1;38(3):265–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2020.1828955
13. Gerbig A. The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology and Environment. Curr Issues Lang Plan [Internet]. 2003 Jan 1;4(1):91–3. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14664200308668051
14. Istianah A, Suhandano S. Appraisal patterns used on the kalimantan tourism website: An ecolinguistics perspective. Cogent Arts Humanit [Internet]. 2022 Dec 31;9(1):2146928. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2022.2146928
15. Taheri H, sadighi F, Bagheri MS, Bavali M. EFL learners’ L2 achievement and its relationship with cognitive intelligence, emotional intelligence, learning styles, and language learning strategies. Khajavi Y, editor. Cogent Educ [Internet]. 2019 Jan 1;6(1):1655882. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1655882
16. Giessler R. EFL writers’ cognitive engagement with AWE feedback. Lang Aware [Internet]. 2023;1–18. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2023.2269088
17. Awwad A. L2 learners’ and professionals’ perceptions of cognitive task complexity: Towards developing an index of task difficulty. J Asia TEFL. 2019;16(2):468–84.
18. Misiaszek GW. An ecopedagogical, ecolinguistical reading of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): What we have learned from Paulo Freire. Educ Philos Theory [Internet]. 2022 Dec 13;54(13):2297–311. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.2011208
19. Smyth M. Reconceptualizing Qualitative Research: Methodologies without Methodology, by Mirka Koro-Ljungberg. Qual Res Psychol [Internet]. 2016 Jul 2;13(3):264–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2016.1149396
20. Roen K. Review: U. Flick (2006). An Introduction to Qualitative Research . Qual Res Psychol [Internet]. 2007 Oct 11;4(3):259–60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880701473623
21. Hammond M. What is an ecological approach and how can it assist in understanding ICT take-up? Br J Educ Technol. 2020;51(3):853–66.
22. Si B. Explanatory Model Analysis: Explore, Explain, and Examine Predictive Models. J Qual Technol [Internet]. 2022 Aug 26;54(4):486. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.2021.1977101
23. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
24. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.
25. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.
26. Liu, D. (2024). The effects of segmentation on cognitive load, vocabulary learning and retention, and reading comprehension in a multimedia learning environment. BMC Psychology, 12, Article 4.
27. Mayer, R. E. (2021). The cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36, Article 8.
28. Gu, P. Y. (2018). Validation of an online questionnaire of vocabulary learning strategies for ESL learners. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 325-350.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with DIDAKTIKA: Jurnal Pemikiran Pendidikan agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived inappropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.
