Insights from Students on the Use of Asynchronous and Synchronous Approaches during Digital Learning in Thailand’s Primary Schools

Authors

  • Ribeh Najib Muhammad Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30587/didaktika.v30i1.7387

Abstract

The outbreak of Covid-19 necessitated a rapid shift in educational paradigms worldwide. With physical classrooms rendered inaccessible, educators and students turned to distance learning as the new norm. This study investigates the effectiveness of two prominent e-learning strategies: synchronous learning (facilitated by platforms like Zoom) and asynchronous learning (centered on video materials). The primary objective was to discern which approach better supported students in their educational journey while they remained confined to their homes during quarantine. The pandemic disrupted traditional educational models, prompting institutions to adapt swiftly. Distance learning emerged as a lifeline, but questions lingered about the most effective methods. This research aimed to address this gap by comparing synchronous and asynchronous learning strategies. The investigation took place in multiple schools across Thailand, where students had been navigating remote learning. A questionnaire with Likert scale questions assessed students’ perceptions as well as interviews and open-ended responses to provide deeper insights. It turns out that students favored synchronous learning due to its ease of communication. Zoom sessions allowed direct interaction with teachers and peers although both approaches effectively delivered content, but asynchronous learning lacked real-time feedback. Moreover, synchronous learning provided a structured environment, while asynchronous learning allowed flexibility.

References

Accettone, S. (2021). Student perceptions of remote chemistry lecture delivery methods. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(12), 3667-3679. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00758
Dada, E., Alkali, A., & Oyewola, D. (2019). An investigation into the effectiveness of asynchronous and synchronous e-learning mode on students’ academic performance in national open university (noun), maiduguri centre. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 11(5), 54-64. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2019.05.06
Dahmash, N. (2021). Synchronous and asynchronous english writing classes in the efl context: students’ practices and benefits. Arab World English Journal, 12(2), 93-108. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no2.7
Fabriz, S., Mendzheritskaya, J., & Stehle, S. (2021). Impact of synchronous and asynchronous settings of online teaching and learning in higher education on students’ learning experience during covid-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733554
Nguyen, T., Netto, C., Wilkins, J., Bröker, P., Vargas, E., Sealfon, C., … & Stein, G. (2021). Insights into students’ experiences and perceptions of remote learning methods: from the covid-19 pandemic to best practice for the future. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.647986
Sunasee, R. (2020). Challenges of teaching organic chemistry during covid-19 pandemic at a primarily undergraduate institution. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3176-3181. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00542
Yuyun, I. (2023). Investigating university student engagement in online learning: a case study in efl classroom. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(3), 648-667. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i3.46035

Downloads

Published

2024-02-16

How to Cite

Muhammad, R. N. (2024). Insights from Students on the Use of Asynchronous and Synchronous Approaches during Digital Learning in Thailand’s Primary Schools. DIDAKTIKA : Jurnal Pemikiran Pendidikan, 30(1), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.30587/didaktika.v30i1.7387