Pengaruh Keterampilan Berpikir Reflektif terhadap Pemahaman IPA Siswa Kelas 5 Sekolah Dasar
kemampuan berpikir reflektif
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30587/didaktika.v31i2.10035Keywords:
reflective thinking skills, understanding science learning, elementary school students, reflection skillsAbstract
This study aims to examine the effect of reflective thinking on the understanding of Natural Science (IPA) concepts in grade 5 Elementary School students. The problem underlying this study is the low understanding of students on IPA material due to the lack of implementation of learning strategies that encourage in-depth thinking processes. The research method used is a descriptive quantitative approach with data collection techniques through observation of student learning activities and interviews with class teachers in three Public Elementary Schools. The results of the study indicate that the application of reflective thinking strategies in science learning has a positive impact on improving student understanding. Students who are actively involved in the reflection process show better abilities in connecting concepts with real experiences, re-explaining the material in their own words, and showing improvements in answering conceptual questions. Teachers also admit that reflection helps students be more focused and critical during the learning process. These findings indicate that reflective thinking strategies can be an effective approach in improving the quality of science learning at the Elementary School level.
References
Arends, RI (2008). Belajar Mengajar . McGraw-Hill Education.
Anggraini, N. (2020). Pengaruh model pembelajaran inkuiri dan literasi sains terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 7(1), 45–55.
Aswira, D., Hamid, S., & Rahmaniah, R. (2024). Efektivitas model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing berbantuan media audiovisual terhadap hasil belajar IPA siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 12(2), 110–118.
Dervent, F. (2015). The effect of reflective thinking on the teaching practices of preservice physical education teachers.
Dewey, J. (1933). Bagaimana Kita Berpikir . DC Heath and Company.
Gloria, G., Atmojo, I. R. W., & Ardiansyah, R. (2023). Pengaruh project based learning dengan metode design thinking terhadap keterampilan berpikir kreatif. Jurnal Pendidikan Inovasi, 9(1), 22–30.
Hakim, A. N., & Yulia, L. (2024). Dampak Teknologi Digital Terhadap Pendidikan Saat Ini. Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Dan Humaniora, 3(1), 145–163.
Hosnan, M. (2014). Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21 . Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Jaenudin, J., Nindiasari, H., & Pamungkas, A. S. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Matematis Siswa Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 69.
Jatmiko, B., Widodo, SA, & Wicaksono, I. (2017). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran IPA berbasis inkuiri-reflektif untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia , 6(2), 209-216.
Maladerita, W., Septiana, V. W., Gistituati, N., Bentri, A., Doktor, P., Pendidikan, I., & Negeri, U. (2021). EDUKATIF : JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN Peran Guru dalam Menerapkan Kurikulum 2013 di Sekolah Dasar. 3(6), 4771–4776.
Masithoh, D. (2021). Penerapan metode genius learning strategy sebagai upaya meningkatkan prestasi belajar IPA di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Nusantara, 6(1), 50–57.
Melly Suciyati, R., & Vitoria, L. (2017). Pelaksanaan Penilaian Hasil belajar Siswa Pada Sub Tema Hidup Rukun Dengan Teman Bermain di Kelas II SDN 14 Banda Aceh. In Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Unsyiah(Vol. 2, Issue 1).
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (edisi revisi). Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Moon, JA (1999). Refleksi dalam Pembelajaran dan Pengembangan Profesional . Routledge-Falmer.
Muhardini, S., Haifaturrahmah, H., Sudarwo, R., Kartiani, B. S., Anam, K., Mahsup, M., Khosiah, K., Ibrahim, I., & Herianto, A. (2023). Pengembangan modul ajar ilmu pengetahuan alam dan sosial (IPAS) bagi siswa sekolah dasar kelas IV dalam kerangka kurikulum merdeka. Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, 8(2), 77–86.
Ningrum, Anindya Kirana Putri, Novaliyosi, and Hepsi Nindiasari. 2024. “Systematic Literature Review: Model Problem Based Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Matematis Siswa.” Jurnal Educatio10(3):873–80.
Nugroho, A. S., & Firmansyah, F. A. H. (2021). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis dengan model pembelajaran concept sentence berbantuan media kartu kata. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 9(2), 140–149.
Paulus Supriwidodo, and Andarweni Astuti. 2023. “Peningkatan Kemandirian Dan Hasil Belajar Berdiferensiasi Berbasis PBL Pendidikan Agama Katolik SD Santo Fransiskus Sragen.”
Phan, HP (2009). Pengembangan berpikir kritis dan berpikir reflektif: Sebuah perspektif teoritis. Psikologi Pendidikan , 29(6), 575–590.
Ratnasari, D., & Adiwijaya, S. N. (2023). Peningkatan keterampilan menulis siswa kelas II sekolah dasar melalui model pembelajaran Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar, 5(1), 34–42.
Redmond, P. (2014). Reflection as an Indicator of Cognitive Presence. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2014.11.1.46
Rosmiati, Rosmiati, Liliasari, L., Tjasyono, B., Ramalis, T. R., & Satriawan, M. (2020c). Measuring level of reflective thinking of physics pre-service teachers using effective essay argumentation. Reflective Practice, 00(00), 565–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2020.1777957
Rosmiati, Rosmiati, Liliasari Liliasari, Bayong Tjasyono, Taufik Ramlan Ramalis, and Muhammad Satriawan. 2020. “Analysis of Pre-Service Teachers’ Reflective Thinking Ability Profile on Earth Physics Lectures.” Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika 8(1):56–63. doi: 10.26618/jpf.v8i1.3111.
Rustaman, NY (2005). Pembelajaran IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Sae, H., & Radia, E. H. (2023). Media Video Animasi Dalam Pembelajaran IPA Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SD. Indonesian Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 2(2), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.56916/ijess.v2i2.474
Slavin, RE (2006). Psikologi Pendidikan: Teori dan Praktik . Pearson.
Taraju, Ali Rahman, Nurdin Nurdin, and Adawiyah Pettalongi. 2022. “Tantangan Dan Strategi Guru Menghadapi Era Revolusi Industri 4 . 0.” Prosiding Kajian Islam Dan Integrasi Ilmu Di Era Society 5.0 (KIIIES 5.0) Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Datokarama Palu 1:314–15.
Te'a, Y. V., Soro, V. M., Pio, M. O., Una, Y., Tini, F. A., Kaka, Y. L., & Sayangan, Y. V. (2023). Peran guru dalam meningkatkan keaktifan belajar siswa dengan menerapkan metode demonstrasi pada pembelajaran IPA SD kelas rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 10(1), 15–23.
Trisnani, N. (2020). Tingkat Kemampuan Berfikir Relaktif Siswa Sekolah Dasar Kelas Tinggi. Yogyakarta. doi:10.29240/jpd.v4i2.1921
Ulandari, W., Perdiansyah, F., & Zamroni, M. (2020). Peningkatan berpikir kritis melalui metode Problem Based Learning siswa kelas IV SDN Pinang 6 Tangerang. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Nusantara, 6(2), 100–107.
Yulianti, K., & Widodo, SA (2018). Pengaruh Jurnal Reflektif terhadap Pemahaman Konsep IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar , 3(1), 14-22.
Yusri, Ahmand Zaki dan Diyan. 2020. “Model Pembelajaran.” Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan7(2):809–20.
Zahra, F., Putri, D. A., & Muttaqiin, A. (2024). Literatur review: Pengaruh model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada pembelajaran sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Teknologi, 11(1), 20–29.
Zubaidah, S. (2016). Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif: Apa dan Bagaimana?. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan , Universitas Negeri Malang.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Publisher Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with DIDAKTIKA: Jurnal Pemikiran Pendidikan agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived inappropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.
