Memahami Keputusan Meninggalkan Zona Nyaman Karyawan “X” BUMN

Authors

  • Mirza Dwinanda Ilmawan Universitas Internasional Semen Indonesia
  • Feisal Ala'i Universitas Internasional Semen Indonesia

Keywords:

Compensation, Leadership, Conflict

Abstract

Background – Leadership and organizational culture is one of the keys for someone deciding to leave or maintain their work comfort zone. BUMN companies are taken in this case because of the social fact that these companies are able to provide adequate compensation and even tend to be abundant. However, whether these social facts are in line with the facts in the field will be the focus of this study to reveal these things that are juxtaposed with organizational culture and leadership in it. Purpose – This study aims to obtain an empirical picture in the field in order to find the justification for someone leaving the comfort zone of BUMN. Design / Methodology / Approach – This research uses explanatory principles by digging up information related to the decision to leave the comfort zone of BUMN, an interesting phenomenon in which BUMN employees are known to receive better compensation than other companies and have secured prestigious positions in the company but choose to leave. The selected subjects are BUMN executive employees who choose to leave their positions before entering retirement. Result and Discussion – The results of this study reveal an interesting fact where respect for company executives is a very important thing that must be given by the CEO/ President Director and if there is any neglect of this, the risk faced is the loss of potential employees. Other findings may be that further study is the best option to reduce work stress. Conclusion – Organizational culture factors that are too dynamic have a positive influence on leaving the comfort zone of work. Researh Limitations – This study uses a limited subject, therefore the picture described follows the limitations of the number of subjects taken.

References

Becker, F. (1990), The Total Workplace: Facilities Management and the Elastic Organization, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY.

Choi, J. (2019). Let’s agree to disagree? International Journal of Conflict Management. doi:10.1108/ijcma-02-2019-0037

Nina T. Dorata, and Steven T. Petra (2008). CEO duality and compensation in the market for corporate control

Robbins, S. P., & Timothy. (2015). Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Roethlisberger, F.J. and Dickson, W.J. (1939), Management and the Worker, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Trianasari, Y. (2005). Hubungan Antara Persepsi dan Intensif dan Lingkungan Kerja Dengan kualitas kerja. Surakarta.

Winschel, Julija (2021) Climate change policies and carbon-related CEO compensation systems: an exploratory study of European companie

Zainal, V. R., Ramli, M., Mutis, T., & Arafah, W. (2014). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Perusahaan dari teori ke praktek. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-18

How to Cite

Ilmawan, M. D., & Ala’i, F. (2021). Memahami Keputusan Meninggalkan Zona Nyaman Karyawan “X” BUMN. Jurnal Manajerial, 8(02), 153–170. Retrieved from https://journal.umg.ac.id/index.php/manajerial/article/view/2078

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.