EFL TEACHERS’ CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT PRACTICES IN GHANAIAN SECONDARY SCHOOLS: CHALLENGES AND PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30587/inatesol.v3i1.11683Keywords:
Classroom Assessment, EFL Teachers, Ghanaian Secondary Schools, Assessment Literacy, Pedagogical ImplicationsAbstract
This study investigates EFL teachers’ classroom assessment practices in Ghanaian secondary schools, focusing on the types of assessment used, the challenges teachers encounter, and the pedagogical implications of their practices. Employing a qualitative case study design, the study involved 8 to 12 English teachers selected through purposive sampling from selected secondary schools in Ghana. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis, including lesson plans, quizzes, worksheets, marking schemes, and samples of students’ written work. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns across teachers’ reported and observed assessment practices. The findings indicate that teachers regularly used classroom assessment to monitor students’ learning; however, their practices were largely dominated by written tests, quizzes, grammar exercises, reading comprehension tasks, homework, and end-of-unit tests. The use of formative, alternative, communicative, and performance-based assessment remained limited. Major challenges included large class sizes, limited instructional time, examination pressure, heavy workload, insufficient assessment training, limited resources, and students’ varied English proficiency levels. The study concludes that classroom assessment in Ghanaian secondary EFL classrooms needs to move toward a more learning-oriented and communicative approach. Strengthening teachers’ assessment literacy is recommended to support more valid, balanced, and pedagogically meaningful EFL assessment practices.
Downloads
References
Asare, E. (2021). Basic school teachers’ formative assessment practices: Influence of demographic variables. International Journal of Current Approaches in Language, Education and Social Sciences, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.35452/caless.2021.3
Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z
Carless, D., & Winstone, N. (2023). Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(1), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372
Gan, L., & Lam, R. (2022). A review on language assessment literacy: Trends, foci and contributions. Language Assessment Quarterly, 19(5), 503–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2022.2128802
Gan, L., & Lam, R. (2024). Language assessment literacy. Language Teaching, 57(3), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444824000090
Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
Maruf, N., & Halyna, K. (2023). Investigating EFL Teachers’ Perceptions and Meanings on Digital Storytelling in Language Learning: A Narrative Approach. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 10(2). https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v10i2.912
Meng, Y., Cui, Y., & Aryadoust, V. (2025). EFL teachers’ formative assessment literacy and developmental trajectories: A comparative study of face-to-face and blended teaching modes. System, 132, Article 103694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103694
Quainoo, E. A., Asamoah, D., Baidoo-Anu, D., Ye, J., & Boateng, C. A. (2025). Examining profiles of classroom assessment literacy among basic school teachers. Cogent Education, 12(1), Article 2558163. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2558163
Ulyah, F., Anwar, K., & Maruf, N. (2021). The Application of English Songs in Teaching Conditional Sentences through Google Classroom. Budapest International Research and …, August.
Vogt, K., Tsagari, D., & Spanoudis, G. (2020). What do teachers think they want? A comparative study of in-service language teachers’ beliefs on language assessment literacy training needs. Language Assessment Quarterly, 17(4), 386–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2020.1781128
Weng, F., & Shen, B. (2022). Language assessment literacy of teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 864582. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.864582
Winstone, N. E., Balloo, K., & Carless, D. (2022). Discipline-specific feedback literacies: A framework for curriculum design. Higher Education, 83, 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00632-0
Zuhri, S., Anwar, K., & Maruf, N. (2021). The correlation between extensive reading , critical reading , and self- esteem in students ’ reading abilities. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 4(3).
Zulaiha, S., & Mulyono, H. (2020). Exploring junior high school EFL teachers’ training needs of assessment literacy. Cogent Education, 7(1), Article 1772943. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1772943
Zulaiha, S., Mulyono, H., & Ambarsari, L. (2020). An investigation into EFL teachers’ assessment literacy: Indonesian teachers’ perceptions and classroom practice. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 9(1), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2020.1.189
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

_3.png)
_2.png)


