Focus and Scope of Journal

- Tujuan : jurnal ilmiah yang memfasilitasi publikasi dari disiplin ilmu gizi. Ghidza Media Journal diterbitkan oleh Program Studi Gizi, Fakultas Kesehatan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik. Artikel-artikel yang dipublikasikan di Ghidza Media Journal meliputi hasil-hasil penelitian ilmiah di bidang gizi klinik dan dietetik, gizi masyarakat, gizi olahraga, gizi institusi, dan ilmu pangan terkait gizi. 

- Target pembaca : Dosen, Peneliti, Mahasiswa, dan prraktisi pendidikan lainnya

- Artikel dipublikasi oleh Program studi Gizi Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik

Lingkup jurnal :
- penelitian dibidang gizi, pangan dan kesehatan
 

Peer Review

Artikel yang dimuat di Ghidza Media Journal adalah artikel yang telah melalui proses penelaahan oleh Mitra Bestari. Keputusan diterima atau tidaknya suatu artikel di jurnal ini menjadi hak dari Dewan Penyunting berdasarkan rekomendasi dari Mitra Bestari.

Pengecekan Plagiarism: Ghiza Media Jurnal  Jurnal editor menggunakan plagiarism checker X yang mana akan mengidentifikasi plagiarism yang ada dalam manuskrip.

Review Process:

1. Editor menerima manuskrip dari penulis 
2. Editor mengevaluasi tujuan jurnal, scope, evaluate  in house style, supplementary data); (akan ditolak jika tidak memenuhi kriteria)
3. Editor screening for plagiarism onPlagiarism Checker x; ( ditolak jika melebihin 20 % plagiasi )
4. Editor mengirim manuskrip kepada reviewer  form (double blind review, Both reviewer and author remain anonymous to each other);
5. Reviewer mengirim kembali manuskrip yang telah direvisi;
6. Editor memutuskan apakah manuskrip tersebut dapat dipublikasikan atau tidak 
7. mengonfirmasi author.
8. Jika ada revisi maka penulis harus mengembalikan tiga bulan setelahnya. Review Guidelines

 The editor ultimately decides whether to accept or reject the article. The editor will weigh all views and may call for a third opinion or ask the author for a revised paper before making a decision. The online editorial system provides reviewers with a notification of the final decision, if the journal has opted in to this function. If this is not applicable for your journal, you can contact the editor to find out whether the article was accepted or rejected.

Publication Ethics Statement

Ghidza Media Journal adalah jurnal ilmiah yang memfasilitasi publikasi dari disiplin ilmu gizi. Ghidza Media Journal diterbitkan oleh Program Studi Gizi, Fakultas Kesehatan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik. Artikel-artikel yang dipublikasikan di Ghidza Media Journal meliputi hasil-hasil penelitian ilmiah di bidang gizi klinik dan dietetik, gizi masyarakat, gizi olahraga, gizi institusi, dan ilmu pangan terkait gizi. Artikel yang dimuat di Ghidza Media Journal adalah artikel yang telah melalui proses penelaahan oleh Mitra Bestari. Keputusan diterima atau tidaknya suatu artikel di jurnal ini menjadi hak dari Dewan Penyunting berdasarkan rekomendasi dari Mitra Bestari.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Ghidza Media Journal adalah jurnal ilmiah yang memfasilitasi publikasi dari disiplin ilmu gizi. Ghidza Media Journal diterbitkan oleh Program Studi Gizi, Fakultas Kesehatan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik. Artikel-artikel yang dipublikasikan di Ghidza Media Journal meliputi hasil-hasil penelitian ilmiah di bidang gizi klinik dan dietetik, gizi masyarakat, gizi olahraga, gizi institusi, dan ilmu pangan terkait gizi. Artikel yang dimuat di Ghidza Media Journal adalah artikel yang telah melalui proses penelaahan oleh Mitra Bestari. Keputusan diterima atau tidaknya suatu artikel di jurnal ini menjadi hak dari Dewan Penyunting berdasarkan rekomendasi dari Mitra Bestari..

Publication decisions

The editor of the ghidza media jurnal : 

Scientific journals that facilitate the publication of nutritional disciplines. Ghidza Media Journal is published by the Nutrition Study Program, Faculty of Health, Muhammadiyah University Gresik. Articles published in the Ghidza Media Journal include the results of scientific research in the fields of clinical and dietetic nutrition, community nutrition, sports nutrition, institutional nutrition, and food science related to nutrition. The articles published in Ghidza Media Journal are articles that have gone through a review process by Mitra Bestari. The decision to accept whether or not an article in this journal is the right of the Editor is based on a recommendation from Mitra Bestari.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

Author Fees

Ghiza Media Jurnal is an open acces journal, and we are very pleased to inform you (All Authors) that we are free* from any Article Processing Charges or Article Publication Fee.

Readers can read and download any full-text articles for free of charge. But authors may also pay some fees for the Ordered Original Reprint Articles (not reprint issue) with some eligible rates. For details about Original Reprint articles, please contact us.

 

Plagiarism Policy

 

• Plagiarism and self-plagiarism are not allowed.
• The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
• An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
• Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Working Process:

1. Editorial Team checking manuscript on offline and online database manually (checking proper citation and quotation);
2. Editorial Team checking manuscript using Crossref Similarity Check, iThenticate, and Unplag;

We are using C.O.P.E. flowchart to make an action on plagiarism. (link)

Indexing Service