KOMODITAS UNGGULAN KLUSTER AGROINDUSTRI PERKEBUNAN DI PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30587/matrik.v21i1.1053Keywords:
Competitiveness, LQ, DEMATEL, ANPAbstract
The government in an effort to increase global competitiveness makes a plan through the RPJPN document (2005-2025) which implies a gradual transformation to develop a competitive economy in accordance with regional competencies and excellence. Thus, the challenges faced are efforts to increase competitiveness through the development and implementation of innovation systems (innovation driven economy). The national innovation system (SINAS) consists of the support of a number of regional innovation systems (SIDa) so that industrial clusters are formed based on the thematic superior regions. South Sumatra Province in the process of determining the plantation industry cluster based on regional superior commodities is based on the results of deliberations by the regional government without the support of an educational approach undertaken in the determination of the thematic superior. The determination of this industrial cluster can be used as a direction for regional development that can facilitate regional innovation actors in taking strategic policy steps in advancing the region. So this research aims to determine the regional superior commodities and products that are carried out with the academic draft approach to have acceptable and operational characteristics. In this study the determination of regional superior commodities and products is carried out with a scientific approach using the LQ, Integration DEMATEL and ANP methods. The results of this study are coffee (4.54), rubber (4.49) and oil palm (4.45) priority commodity-based priority products that have a good industrial value chain to be developed by innovation actors in formulating policies and programs for support the regional superior products in order to have national and global competitiveness.
References
Ankrah, Samuel., Al-Tabbaa, Omar., (2015), “Universities-Industry Collaboration: A systemic review”, Scandinavian Journal of Management (31), page 387-408.
BPPT, (2000), “Pohon Industri Inovasi Teknologi”, BPPT Press, Jakarta.
BPPT, Tim., (2012), “Naskah Akademik Buku Putih Penguatan Sistem Inovasi Nasional”, Deputi Bidang Pengkajian Kebijakan Teknologi BPPT: Jakarta.
BPS, Tim., (2015), “Sumsel Dalam Angka”, Badan Pusat Statistika Provinsi Sumatera Selatan: Sumatera Selatan.
BALITBANGNOVDA, Tim., (2012), “Buku Saku Profil Litbang Daerah”, Badan Penelitian Pengembangan dan Inovasi Daerah Prov. Sumsel: Sumsel.
Ciptomulyono, Udisubakti., (2000), “Integrasi Metode Dhelpi dan Prosedur Analisis Hirarki (AHP) untuk Identifikasi dan Penetapan Prioritas Objektif/Kriteria Keputusan”. Journal IPTEK, Vol.7.
Ciptomulyono, U. (2010). Paradigma Pengambilan Keputusan Multikriteria dalam Perspektif Pengembangan Projek dan Industri yang Berwawasan Lingkungan, Pidato Pengukuhan untuk Jabatan Guru Besar dalam Bidang Ilmu Pengambilan Keputusan Multikriteria pada Jurusan Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknolologi Industri, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya.
Wang, Y.L. Dan Tzeng, G.H. (2012), "Brand Marketing for Creating Brand Value Based on A MCDM Model Combining DEMATEL with ANP and VIKOR Methods", Expert Systems with Applications, No. 39, hal. 5600-5615.
Henry Etzkowitz, 2008, “The Triple Helix: University–Industry–Government Innovation in Action”, Routledge, New York.
Hendayana, Rahmat (2003), "Aplikasi Metode Location Quotient (LQ) dalam Penentuan Komoditas Unggulan Nasional", Informatika Pertanian No. 12, hal. 1-17.
Herawati, C.T., (2010), “Perencanaan Strategis Industri Jasa Perawatan & Perbaikan Kendaraan Bermotor Untuk Menerapkan Manajemen Green Company Dengan Pendekatan MCDM-AHP Dan Analisa SWOT”, Tesis, MMT ITS Surabaya.
Kramer, Jan-Philipp., Marinelli, Elisabetta., Lammarino, Simona., Diez, Revilla, Javier., (2011), “Intagible assets as drivers of innovation:Emperical evidence on multinational enterprise in German and UK regional systems of innovation”, Journal Technovation (31), page 447-458.
Kravtsova, V dan Radosevic, S. (2012), "Are Systems of Innovation in Europe Efficient?", Economic Systems, No. 36, hal. 109-126.
Liao, Shu-Hsien., Wu, Chi-chuan., (2010), “System perspective of knowledge management, organizational learning, and organizational innovation”, Journal of Expert System with Applications (37), page 1096-1103.
Lin, R.-H. (2009), “An Integrated FANP–MOLP for Supplier Evaluation and Order Allocation”, Applied Mathematical Modelling, No. 33, hal. 2730–2736.
Rangkuti., Freddy (2002), “Analisa SWOT Teknik Membedah Kasus Bisnis, Reorientasi Konsep Perencanaan Strategis Untuk Menghadapai Abad 21”, PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Perindustrian, Kementrian., (2013), “Kajian Pengembangan Kompetensi Inti Industri di Wilayah III (Kawasan Papua dan Maluku)”, Laporan Penelitian, Jakarta.
Porter, Michael., (1994), “Competitive Advantage (Keunggulan Bersaing)”, Edisi Bahasa Indonesia, Binarupa aksara, Jakarta.
Puspita, F. Niniek , 2014, “Pengembangan SIDa Provinsi Jawa Timur”, LPPM ITS, Surabaya
Rangkuti., Freddy (2002), “Analisa SWOT Teknik Membedah Kasus Bisnis, Reorientasi Konsep Perencanaan Strategis Untuk Menghadapai Abad 21”, PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Riset dan Teknologi, Kementrian., (2014), “Panduan Penguatan Sistem Inovasi Daerah (SIDa)”, Deputi Bidang Jaringan IPTEK: Jakarta.
Saaty, T.L., (2000), “Fundamental Of Decision Making & Priority Theory With Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)”. Pittsburg: RWS Publications.
Vujanovic dkk. (2012), “Evaluation of Vehicle Fleet Maintenance Management Indicators by Application of DEMATEL and ANP”, Expert Systems with Applications, No. 39, hal. 10552-10563.
