Sumber Daya Manusia Generasi Z di Era Artificial Intelligence: Menggabungkan Kreativitas, Teknologi dan Kewirausahaan (Pengabdian Masyarakat pada SMA Muhammadiyah 3 Bungah, Gresik)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30587/jpm.v5i01.10253Keywords:
Generation Z, Artificial Intelligence, Technology Literacy, Entrepreneurship, Community ServiceAbstract
The advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and digital transformation has significantly impacted the world of work, education, and entrepreneurship. Generation Z, as digital natives, faces challenges in adapting quickly to these changes, particularly due to low AI literacy, limited 21st-century skills, and lack of early entrepreneurial exposure. This community service program aimed to equip student of SMA Muhammadiyah 3 Bungah, Gresik, with relevant knowledge, skill, and mindset through an IPTEKS-based approach (Science, Technology, and the Arts). The method employed was participatory and experiental, starting from needs assessment, module development, to the implementation of seminars, business simulation, and mentoring sessions. The results showed significant improvement in students’ understanding of AI, their confidence in presenting ideas, and their ability to collaborate. These finding indicate that contextual education in technological literacy and entrepreneurship is and effective strategy for preparing young human resources to become adaptive, creative, and competitive in the digital disruption era.
References
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Statistik Pendidikan Indonesia 2023.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986(23–28), 2.
Bruneel, J., Ratinho, T., Clarysse, B., & Groen, A. (2012). The Evolution of Business Incubators: Comparing demand and supply of business incubation services across different incubator generations. Technovation, 32(2), 110–121.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning: Four lectures on mind and culture (Vol. 3). Harvard university press.
Dewey, J. (1986). Experience and education. The Educational Forum, 50(3), 241–252.
Drucker, P., & Maciariello, J. (2014). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge.
Duckworth, A. (2016). Grit: The power of passion and perseverance (Vol. 234). Scribner New York, NY.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.
Gagne, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., Keller, J. M., & Russell, J. D. (2005). Principles of instructional design. Wiley Online Library.
Granatir, W. L. (2003). Stand By Me: The Risks and Rewards of Mentoring Today’s Youth. Psychiatry, 66(4), 364.
Indonesia, P. P. R., & INDONESIA, R. (2017). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional. Peratur Pres Republik Indones Nomor, 18, 2020–2024.
Kaufman, R. A., & English, F. W. (1979). Needs assessment: Concept and application. Educational Technology.
Kring, B. (2018). iGen: Why Today’s Super-connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy-and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood-and What That Means for the Rest of Us by Jean Twenge. Group, 42(4), 363–365.
Luckin, R., & Holmes, W. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education.
McKinsey Global Institute. (2023). The Future of Work in the Age of AI and Automation. https://www.mckinsey.com
OECD. (2022). Skills Outlook 2022: Learning for Life.
Pew Research Center. (2019). Defining Generations: Where Millennials End and Generation Z Begins. https://www.pewresearch.org
Rhodes, J. E., Grossman, J. B., & Resch, N. L. (2002). Agents of change: Pathways through which mentoring relationships influence adolescents’ academic adjustment. In Annual Progress in Child Psychiatry and Child Development 2000-2001 (pp. 585–604). Routledge.
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263.
Schwab, K. (2024). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: what it means, how to respond1. In Handbook of research on strategic leadership in the Fourth Industrial Revolution (pp. 29–34). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Stake, R. (1995). Case study research. Cham: Springer.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons.
Twenge, J. M., Cooper, A. B., Joiner, T. E., Duffy, M. E., & Binau, S. G. (2019). Age, period, and cohort trends in mood disorder indicators and suicide-related outcomes in a nationally representative dataset, 2005–2017. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128(3), 185.
UNESCO. (2016). Education 2030: Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action for the Implementation of SDG 4.
World Economic Forum. (2023). Future of Jobs Report 2023. https://www.weforum.org/reports/future-of-jobs-report-2023/
Zhang, B., & Dafoe, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence: American attitudes and trends. Available at SSRN 3312874.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Abdul Kadir Alamudi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.