Peer-Review Process Policy

Reviewing process will consider novelty, objectivity, method, scientific impact, conclusion, and references. Reviewers' comments will be sent to the corresponding author for necessary actions and responses. Editorial Board will evaluate the reviewer’s comment and then send the final decision regarding the submission to the corresponding author based on reviewer’s recommendation.

Plagiarism Screening Policy

MP will immediately investigate and reject papers leading to plagiarism or self-plagiarism. MP Editorial Board will ensure that every published article will not exceed 20% similarity Score.

Plagiarism Screening Policy

Herclips will immediately investigate and reject papers leading to plagiarism or self-plagiarism. Herclips Editorial Board will ensure that every published article will not exceed 20% similarity Score. 

Post-Publication Discussions and Corrections

Herclips accepts discussion and corrections on published articles by reader. In case the reader giving discussions and corrections toward a published article, the reader can contact by email to Editor in Chief by explaining the discussions and corrections. If accepted (by Editor in Chief), the discussions and correction will be published in next issue as Letter to Editor. Respected Authors can reply/answer the discussions and corrections from the reader by sending the reply to Editor in Chief. Therefore, Editors may publish the answer as Reply to Letter to Editor.