Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

HECLIPS  as a communication media for research in pharmacy sector. We publish original research papers, or reviews in csince and pharmavy include Development of pharmaceutical products from natural material, treatment technolog, Clinical and community pharmacy, Development of pharmacy services, Phamaceuticlas or cosmetic production, Other reseacrh related to sciences, health or pharmaceurical tehcnology that have neither been published elsewhere in any language nor under review for publication elsewhere. The following statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the editor, the reviewer, and the publisher Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines.

This scientific publication code of ethics is the code of ethics for all parties involved in the scientific journal publication process, namely managers, editors, reviewer, and author(s). The Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications essentially upholds three ethical values in publication, namely neutrality, justice and honeslty

Allegation of Research Misconduct

Research misconduct means fabrication, falsification, citation manipulation, or plagiarism in producing, performing, or reviewing research and writing an article by authors, or in reporting research results. When authors are found to have been involved with research misconduct or other serious irregularities involving articles that have been published in other scientific journals. Editors have a responsibility to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the scientific record.

In cases of suspected misconduct, the Editors and Editorial Board will use the best practices of COPE to assist them to resolve the complaint and address the misconduct fairly. This will include an investigation of the allegation by the Editors. A submitted manuscript that is found to contain such misconduct will be rejected. For cases in which it is unlikely that misconduct has occurred, clarifications, additional analyses, or both, published as letters to the editor, and often including a correction notice and correction to the published article are sufficient.

Institutions are expected to conduct an appropriate and thorough investigation of allegations of scientific misconduct. Ultimately, authors, journals, and institutions have an important obligation to ensure the accuracy of the scientific record. By responding appropriately to concerns about scientific misconduct, and taking necessary actions based on evaluation of these concerns, such as corrections, retractions with replacement, and retractions.

Ethical Issue

If the research work involves chemicals, human, animals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript in order to obey ethical conduct of research using animals and human objects. If required, Authors must provide legal ethical clearance from the association or legal organization. If the research involves confidential data and of business/marketing practices, authors should clearly justify this matter whether the data or information will be hidden securely or not.

Authorship 
All persons listed as authors should qualify for authorship. Such authorship should be limited to persons who have contributed significantly to the conception, design, execution, data acquisition, data analysis, or interpretation of the manuscript. All other persons who have participated in certain important aspects of the research but do not qualify as authors should be acknowledged. Authorship is the responsibility of the corresponding author; he or she should ensure that all appropriate co-authors are included in the manuscript.

Request to add or remove author(s) or to arrange the author names of the accepted manuscript before it is published, must be explained by a letter to the Chief Editor. This letter must be signed by all authors of the paper. An author statement form must also be updated by every author and resubmitted to Chief Editor.

Responsibilities of authors 
Authors are obliged to follow in peer review process set by HERCLIPS.  Authors are responsible for:

1. Providing original and accurate data (in a clear, honest, and without duplication, data fabrication, data falsification, or plagiarism) concerning the manuscript submitted and providing the data when requested. 
2. The submitted manuscript should not be under consideration or accepted for publication elsewhere. Where parts of the data have been published elsewhere, the sources must be acknowledged or cited accordingly. 
3. When reproducing data from other sources, proper citation and permission are required. 
4. Authors should ensure that studies involving animals are performed according to animal ethics and welfare. 
5. Any potential conflict of interest has to be declared, including any financial, personal, or other relationships with other people or organizations related to their work that could affect their work. 
6. All sources of financial support for the research project and study sponsor(s) (if any) and their role in the research or study should be disclosed in the Acknowledgement. 
7. Authors are requested to be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions, and apologies when needed.
8. The author is responsible for the confirmation submitted for the manuscript that has been written.
9. The author does not mind if the manuscript is edited without changing the substance or main ideas of the writing

 Responsibilities of reviewers

 

1. Assist the editor in making editorial decisions on incoming manuscripts.
2. Reviewers are responsible for the recommendations of the manuscripts they study. Reviewers are requested to assist in improving the quality of the manuscript through an objective review process within a scheduled period and contribute to the decision-making process on the manuscript.
3. Manuscript review is carried out objectively, and supported by clear arguments. If reviewers find any published or submitted content similar to that under review, the editor has to be informed
4. Reviewers are responsible for citations, references, duplications, fabrication data, falsification data and plagiarism of the manuscripts they study.
5. Reviewers must always maintain the confidentiality of information and not use information from the text they are studying for personal interest.
6. Responsibilities of editors Responsible for publishing the manuscript after going through the process of editing, reviewing, and layout in accordance with the rules for publishing Scientific Journals. Responsible for maintaining privacy and protecting intellectual property and copyright, and editorial freedom. Unpublished manuscripts will not be used by the editor's research for their own benefit and will be returned directly to the author.